So i found this article on the web and i was told that just posting it as the whole article is not the best thing, I got consent from the original author and read up the way to curate posts, so that is it…….i thought this was fascinating as it highlights some of the highs and lows that I encountered when i was working in the business.
Maybe you have considered getting an exciting wireless office? Would you believe it is difficult at this timeOr it’s not practical? In case your response to that real question is yes, you will want to see this short article for sure.
Let’s explore overturn situation first: What could often be the benefits of wired systems over wireless systems? Well, the immediate points that involves our mind may be the following:
Speed. Wireless systems are regarded as slow and getting a minimal bandwidth.
Real-time programs. Wireless systems cannot handle real-time programs like voice and video.
Security. The wireless signals achieve even over the road. Let’s say someone hacks directly into my network?
Incompatibility: Certain products like ink jet printers etc. aren’t Wi-Fi enabled. Laptop Computer doesn’t have Wi-Fi cards.
Let us take a look at each point individually on walkie talkies (I’m penning this article within the perspective of the enterprise/office network, and therefore I’m presuming the Wi-Fi network is made using Wireless Remotes, Access Points and Store)
Wired systems were built with a decent speed of 100 Megabyte per second and nowadays possess a speed of 1000 Megabyte per second. Wireless systems have only a speed of 54 Megabyte per second which too is shared among many customers.
Produce one application which may take up 1000 Megabyte per second per port, as well as 100 Megabyte per second per port after which most likely I could accept the above mentioned statement. The truth is, even when your workplace runs demanding programs like multimedia, ERP, video etc, the utmost bandwidth requirement per user might not mix even 4 Megabyte per second! Now go ahead and take 54 Megabyte per second of Wi-Fi systems and think that 15 individuals are hooking up to it, each user could get around 2.5 Megabyte per second, that is sufficient for many from the programs that people have today, and when all of the 15 customers don’t connect simultaneously, just one user of a walkie talkie could easily get much more bandwidth. Actually, using the creation of 802.11n standard for Wi-Fi, the bandwidth available per entry way is about 300 Megabyte per second and can touch 600 Megabyte per second in the long run. So, even when 15 people interact with one 802.11n access point, they may get more than 20 Megabyte per second, that is a lot more than sufficient for the majority of the programs around the network today.
Let’s say I run PC based interactive video during my company? Can the wireless systems handle real-time traffic?
A decent interactive video client might not take a lot more than 256-384 Killerbytes per second for giving 30 f/s quality video with H.264 compression. The number of such conferences are likely to happen concurrently? And real-time programs run perfectly in case your wireless controller supports WMM – Wireless Multi Media protocol which prioritize the actual time traffic within the normal traffic, and the majority of the remotes today support it. Even voice is supported around the wireless LAN – such as the seamless handover in one AP to a different, if you’re transporting the VoWLAN mobile phone models. There’s a fascinating technology that’s growing fast, which is known as FMC – Fixed Mobile Convergence where your IP Phones and Cell phones could be integrated having a single mobile phone and you’ve got one number for. Though IP Landline Phones aren’t based on Wireless Systems, such improvements (Like FMC and VoWLAN mobile phone models for voice-over wireless LAN) help include capabilities in addition to provide the fundamental service a lot more effectively.
The wireless signals can penetrate the walls and actually go over the road – let’s say someone hacks my network?
This really is a legitimate concern. The safety is jeopardized in case your wireless communications aren’t encoded using the latest standards and proper security guidelines aren’t applied. But when the safety guidelines are applied based on the latest standards (like 802.11i etc), then your likelihood of smashing the network from outdoors is extremely less. Also, you will find Wireless Invasion prevention software’s that are offered within the market nowadays which keep checking for wireless risks and makes use of plus they inform as well as thwart tries to intrude directly into your wireless network instantly.
You will find certain products which are not Wi-Fi compatible – like certain ink jet printers, fax machines and copiers etc. But you’ll be amazed at the number of products are Wi-Fi compliant and also have in a commercial sense ready Wi-Fi based items already – Surveillance Cameras, Multi-Function Products, Access Control Card visitors, Laptops, Projectors and nearly every network based device includes a Wi-Fi compliant model. Even when certain items aren’t Wi-Fi compliant, cables might be attracted selectively for individuals programs alone, rather than wiring the entire office with three ports per cubicle! Actually, Wireless Access Points have to be linked to LAN cables behind finish, so a restricted quantity of wired switch ports is anyway needed. And you will find always USB based Wi-Fi adaptors that may be employed to create a pc (PC) wireless.
So, getting established that wired systems aren’t naturally better than current generation wireless systems, let’s now consider the additional advantages that wireless systems provide over wired systems :
Less Cost Saving with the amount of cables, switch ports needed but additionally in the price of passive components.
Comfort and Mobility – The wireless systems are available anywhere – even within the canteen and also the lawn. You just need a Wi-Fi enabled laptop to access them. And also the customers can connect with the network everywhere – working areas, conference rooms, grass etc.
Redundancy: If the Access Point fails, another neighbouring entry way can instantly connect the customers (without needing to alter the port connection by hand like in wired systems).
Network access control, AD integration: The centralized management functionality from the wired systems using Active Directory (or LDAP etc) can be obtained with the majority of the wireless systems today. Actually, controller based wireless systems can provide network access control – grouping the customers and determining which customers get access to which assets within the network (Restricting certain customers from being able to access the web, etc).
Load balancing: The access points can instantly push the customers to neighbouring access points if they’re overloaded. Some remotes even let it restrict the bandwidth that the single user/group can access within the LAN, to ensure that they don’t overload the network.
You will find a lot more, but when you would like to go over further on a single or on any particular subject, hop to our blog. There’s an entire category on wireless systems!