Portable Internet

two way radio earpiece microphoneWhat would you do if i said I had found a new zealand two way radio ltd piece that isnt only fascinating but educational also? I knew you would not believe me, so here it is the educational, excellent and appealing article

Choosing the very best portable wi-fi compatability plan can be challenging if you are not really a tech savvy individual actually, it can also be just a little hard for individuals who operate in I.T. You will find now a lot of broadband options available you could be pardoned because of not knowing which most closely fits your needs as well as suits your financial allowance so it is always important to check out these options because walkie talkies can also know accsess the internet and it is important to understand these options.

Access to the internet could possibly get costly and several individuals have fallen victim to bill shock. How will you avoid such broadband issues while taking pleasure in all of the benefits that portable access to the internet offers customers?

It is not difficult! Become an educated and informed consumer so you will not get fooled into thinking that this is thr right way to go about things and that for many people the Icom F25SR is another suitible option that you might want to consider. Just what does which means that? It is a procedure for evaluating the merchandise available before registering and investing your hard earned money with an impulse purchase.

Let us take a look at couple of ways you are able to evaluate set up product you are thinking about would create a perfect match your usage habits along with your budget.

1) Consult with buddies & family. Derive reviews out of your buddies and family since you know they will be extremely honest. They are in position to gain nothing and provides you with their honest opinion about the organization you’re thinking about registering with. Sometimes these comments are great so excellent that they may let you know without compelling!

This is a obvious sign the organization is a great one! In other cases, they may bemoan the very fact you are thinking about using a particular company and then try to convince you to register having a different one rather and at the same time you might want to think about the Kenwood TK3301 that goes alongside these other products and the obvious benefit both of them are likely to bring. No matter an optimistic or negative review, feedback from buddies and family is the greatest kind of review you will get about Internet items.

2) Compare plans. When you choose to sit lower and compare portable wi-fi compatability intentions of offer, it is important that explore concentrate on cost alone. While broadband prices is definitely an essential aspect inside your buying decision, some plans aren’t always just like they first appear. Some companies attempt to tempt you with offers of half cost deals and nominal monthly access costs while obfiscating their excess usage costs and pricey exit costs for breaking your contract.

If you liked this article and you would like to acquire additional info concerning SL4000 2 way radio (http://www.beautifulradio.net/?p=20) kindly check out our own web page.

Defender smartphone combines phone and walkie-talkie

two way radio with gpsWith so much information on the net about 2 way Radio’s it can be hard to find the top and most direct information. here is a piece from a good site that i believe as veritable, don’t quote me on it but please read and enjoy
Defender smartphone combines phone and walkie-talkie
The latest rugged smartphone to hit the market is called the Defender. But is it as tough as the vehicle of the same name? David Cousins finds out.
Theres one thing we need to establish at the outset: this phone isnt related to the Land Rover of the same name or the rugged phones that Land Rover puts its name on.
However, in every other way the name is a pretty good one. This is one tough and rubbery contender, with a thick layer of grippy ribbed material around the sides and back of the unit. The bungs that stop water getting into the headphone and charger sockets (which can sometimes look a bit weedy) look toughly made and unlikely to allow any water to get through.
No surprise then that it bears the IP68 standard for resistance to both dust and water. In fact its happy to sit in 1m of water (though, like all phones it cant get a signal in that situation) and is rated to be dropped on to concrete from 1m. You could probably drop it from 2m or 3m quite happily, but the manufacturer understandably wont guarantee that.
Open the back (a coin will undo the two screwheads) and youll notice the huge battery. This 2,600mAh whopper is rather bigger then than the 1,500mAh youll find in most regular smartphones and it does mean you should get a decent interval between charges. It can also run two SIM cards, which is great if youre in an area with dodgy reception, though this does wear out the battery more quickly.
The operating system is standard Android 4.2.2 fare, so anyone with a non-Apple phone will find it pretty familiar to use. The usual goodies are there, too: music player, decent-quality 8MP front and rear cameras and video camera.
One unusual trick the Defender has up its chunky sleeve is the ability to communicate with regular PMR446 radios. So rather than carrying both items around in your pockets, you can use one piece of equipment for both.
Range is the usual 1km (all non-licensed UK walkie talkies are limited to 0.1kW of output), which is fine for communicating around the farm and buildings.
One drawback is that you have to screw in the 10cm-long aerial before using the walkie-talkie, which makes the whole apparatus quite a substantial piece of kit. So its strictly for those capacious pockets.
Cost is 349 + VAT from Daventry firm The Phone Trader. If you are already on a 25/month or more plan, you may be able to get it as a free upgrade.
Source – http://www.fwi.co.uk/articles/15/04/2014/144154/defender-smartphone-combines-phone-and-walkie-talkie.htm

Motorola pitches 2 Way Radios to safety officials

Some of these professional writers on the net are at such a high level that i ponder if any of them have ever created a paperback? well sometimes i like to spotlight these excellent items and here’s one i found interesting the other day.

Fire Chief Greg DeLor knows just the kind of radio he wants his department to have when the E-911 consolidation is complete.

The radio works underwater, can filter out sounds such as the roar of a fire engine, is more durable than their current web sites, he said, dropping the demonstration model on the floor with a thud.

“I would not be doing that with the radio I have now. It would be ruined,” DeLor said.

DeLor was among the more than 100 first responders and officials from most of the 36 departments in Lake County who will come under the umbrella of the consolidated E-911 center who attended a demonstration Monday of radio equipment offered by Motorola Solutions.

Motorola was selected to provide the infrastructure for the state-mandated consolidation of the county’s 17 dispatch centers into one center by Dec. 31. It’s also one of three companies vying to sell its radios for police and fire departments, with the others being Harris and EF Johnson.

Under the consolidation, each city and town must supply and pay for the radios its emergency personnel use. Each municipality may choose its radios from the vendor of their choice, providing the radios can communicate with the Motorola infrastructure.

Frank Galvin, of Motorola Solutions, said the company decided to host the event at St. Elijah Church in Merrillville to give police and fire officials a chance to get a close look at the variety of radios available as well as accessories and programming options.

Jim Lilley, Merrillville’s deputy fire chief, said he liked the opportunity to see the equipment and ask questions.

“It was a good demonstration. It was nice to actually see stuff used hands-on,” Lilley said.

One demonstration showed how a two Way Radio that had part of its housing peeled off could still work while under water, even for an extended period of time. Another used a running Crown Point fire truck to show how the radio filters out background noise.

Galvin said the demonstration gives officials a chance to see what’s available and how the radios can grow with their departments.

“Everything doesn’t have to happen today. There is so much technology that can be active as needed,” he said.

The wireless connections that may transform our lives

So to resume my run of articles on this website, I have planned to share one of our favourite articles this week. I used to be tentative to include it to this blog as I really didn’t wish to offend the original writer, but I hope he/she is glad that I loved reading their article and planned to share it with my readers.

“Start Quote But the Internet of Everything is so large a concept that the vision rapidly becomes first daunting and then a bit paralysing, even to the experts. ”
End Quote Peter Day But that was long before the concept of Silicon Fen emerged from the concentration of clever people who clustered inside Cambridge University’s laboratories.

In 1990, the silicon chip design business ARM was spun out of Acorn, the Cambridge company that had made the pioneering BBC micro-computer. That was in the days when computer-makers often did their own chip designs rather than buy them in from the great big manufacturers.

ARM specialised in chips that used much less power than their rivals. It still does, very successfully. These chips have become increasingly important with the rise of mobile phones and mobile computing, ushering in a wireless world of a scale and scope undreamed of by the pioneers at Pye.

And wireless became a Cambridge speciality. Cambridge Silicon Radio (now CSR) was a company founded in 1999 to create chips for Bluetooth short range wireless communication.

Many of the newer wireless businesses are not well-known. They may have a global reach, but they are consultants or firms without consumer brand names. But that does not mean they are not making money or employing well paid specialists.
Talking domestic appliances This emergence of a wireless cluster around Cambridge is a significant addition to the British business landscape, and from it has emerged this Future of Wireless conference.

This year the subject has been the Internet of Things, or the “Internet of Everything, or Everywhere”.
Intelligent fridges have long been talked about Just imagine, say the visionaries, what will happen when we start to add sensors and data streaming devices to objects, and things start interconnecting just as people do now.
You’ll be able to monitor the security of your house from across the world, via the internet, and turn on the central heating when you’re coming home.

Doctors will be able to get live feeds of vital signs from their patients – blood pressure, sugar level, heartbeat. Sensors in stomachs will tell farmers when their cattle need medicine or extra feed.
And fridges will notify owners when they are running low on ingredients for the evening meal.
“Start Quote So many uncertainties and potential difficulties surround the idea of the Internet of Things that it is easy to scoff at the hugeness of the concept.”

End Quote Peter Day A lot of this is fairly familiar. I’ve been hearing about the intelligent fridge for almost 20 years.
Lots of appliances are now so computerised that they ought to be able to benefit from internet connectivity, so that (for example) a connected washing machine could find out how to wash a fabric not invented when the machine was made.
The experts at this conference have been driven by that vision of 50 billion connected things. And at first sight it is both dramatic and exciting for the wireless specialists.

A whole world of possibilities we can barely think about enabled by connectivity that will require some big advances in technology – bandwidth provision, low power transmission, really low-cost devices much cheaper than mobile phones.
‘Killer application’ But the Internet of Everything is so large a concept that the vision rapidly becomes first daunting and then a bit paralysing, even to the experts. Who will organise the protocols that enable machines to speak to machines? What regulation will be needed?

What about security – who might be hacking in to my central heating system?
Who will do the connecting? Existing mobile networks or new ones? Who will pay what for this extension of the convenience world?
The technology could mean farmers get sent data about their animals’ heath Where is the killer application that will suddenly have consumers clamouring for interconnected devices in the way that the internet itself took off in the 1990s after Sir Tim Berners-Lee at Cern invented the www address system, the worldwide web?

Will the current internet giants evolve into Internet of Things corporations, or will the winners be new, nimble and unheard of?
So many uncertainties and potential difficulties surround the idea of the Internet of Things that it is easy to scoff at the hugeness of the concept.
And yet, of course, it is already happening, bit by bit, sector by sector – at different speeds according to what area of industry or human activity is involved.

Cars are already hugely computerised; the European Union is mandating that all new cars in Europe will have to be fitted with what is called the eCall system, which will automatically connect a vehicle to emergency services following a collision and provide location and impact information.
(It has to be said that this was first planned in 2005 with a 2009 deadline for implementation, so there is a lot of room for drift.)

Telemedicine using sensors is being tested in various parts of the world, and may be invaluable in an ageing world. Cameras are already wirelessing their pictures to the internet.
The stands at the Cambridge conference include start-up companies involved with those farm sensors for animals to swallow and send their health data direct to farmers’ computers by wireless.
Another business is seeking to seed farmland with hundreds of cheap devices which will 2 Way Radio aridity information direct to a control room so that farmers can direct irrigation directly to the parts of fields where it is needed.

There is plenty of room for bold new disruptive entrepreneurs.
My conclusion to two days’ exposure to the exhilarating possibilities of the Internet of Things is that it’s too huge to grasp and too easy to get carried away into a sci-fi rhapsody.
But think about it sector by sector, industry by industry, place by place, and something begins to emerge out of the mist. It is happening all round us. But it will probably not be called the Internet of Things.

Article written by Peter Day Peter Day Global business correspondent
More from Peter
Wise words from an (almost) unknown guru 12:01 UK time, Wednesday, 18 December 2013
The late Mary Parker Follett is the greatest management thinker most people have never heard of, but her ideas remain as vital as ever.
Read full article

If you beloved this write-up and you would like to obtain extra details pertaining to Kenwood two way radio kindly stop by our own webpage.

Cell Phone Towers and Mobile Phone Masts – Beacons of Harm

For years people have been telling me that family, love and happiness are the most important things in life…These days I realise that I can take or leave all that so long as I have this 2 way radio noaa in the world.

telecom communication device limitedIs it a cactus? A palm tree? A water tower? No! It’s a cell phone tower! That’s right! Cell phone towers today are being disguised in subtle ways unheard of just a few years ago. See a grain silo? Or a church steeple? You guessed it. It could very well be a cell phone tower. There’s even a cell phone tower that looks just like a lighthouse…never mind that it’s over two miles from the ocean.

But don’t let the pretty and ingenious disguises fool you. There is a real and present danger lurking behind the mask of these innocent designs.

Why the disguises? Obviously, for aesthetic reasons. The cell phone companies don’t want to make their neighborhood friends upset. They want to blend in. So they blend in while they blast your home and neighborhood with toxic electromagnetic radiation.

Cell phone towers, sometimes called masts, or mobile phone towers, weren’t an issue years ago when they were few and far between. One could often drive miles and miles through the countryside and never see one. They were few in number and were only found in obscure locations and seen only on an occasional hilltop. Today cell phone towers have increased dramatically in number. There are now more than 1.9 million cell phone towers and antenna towers spread throughout the U.S. They are now found on churches, schools and firehouses as well as being seen on the rooftop of buildings everywhere. Did you know there is even a cell phone tower near Old Faithful in Yellowstone Park? Can’t sleep well at night? It may be that there’s a cell phone tower close by.

Just why would a mobile phone tower be placed on a church, school or firehouse? Why would school boards and churches agree to this? Money. It’s that simple. The mobile phone companies will pay these organizations, and individual property owners, handsomely to install their equipment on their properties. This “rent money” can range from a few hundred dollars a month to several thousand dollars a month. What school district or church couldn’t use extra money to aid a struggling budget? By “renting” the space on an already-constructed building the cell phone industry doesn’t have to purchase land, build a tower or construct a new building. It simply mounts its equipment on a structure that already exists. It’s a win-win deal for the cell phone company and the new ‘landlord.’

Opposition to these cell tower installments used to gone unnoticed and without question. Not so today. Neighborhoods and citizens are becoming vocally opposed. But it’s not the esthetics that causes residents and property owners to oppose these structures. Communities and citizens are afraid of the potential health effects being caused by this technology as well as the adverse affect on property values.

We Can’t Stop Cell Phone Tower Construction

Unfortunately, there isn’t much one can do to stop the proliferation and continued build out of cell phone towers and structures. Although thought to be legislation about deregulation issues, the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (TCA) was really an open invitation for the cell phone industry to place their towers anywhere they wanted. Section 704 of the TCA basically states that local authorities can’t ban the placement of towers in their jurisdictions. The law says: “No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission’s regulations concerning such emissions.” So legally the local government can’t refuse the construction of a cell phone tower in your neighborhood! Any challenge by local communities could easily end up in federal court. Our lawmakers have basically given the cell phone industry free reign to install these towers wherever they want. And, by the way, the cell phone industry helped write this legislation that our government officials passed as law! The public, therefore, now has no voice and no vote. Is there something wrong with this picture? Why didn’t our public officials represent the people instead of big business? Why would you let the very industry you’re trying to regulate write it’s own laws?

Does the income outweigh the potential risks? It appears not. Scores of studies and well-respected research have exposed alarming health effects from various forms of cancer to stress. Many experts today are predicting an epidemic in brain cancer soon.

Representatives from the industry are quick to point out the microwaves emitted by cell phone towers are well below federal standards. And indeed they may be. At least on paper. Most towers operate at a power output of 100 watts. However, this isn’t the total wattage of the tower. What they aren’t telling you is that 100 watts is the power per channel. Since one tower may have dozens of channels you can see that the power output could be highly excessive and well beyond 100 watts. It’s a technical loophole. And, of course, who is monitoring the power output from these towers after they are erected? The FCC certainly isn’t. It doesn’t have the manpower or money to properly regulate the millions of towers and antennas now online. And who is to prevent these companies from turning up the wattage when no one is around? Some have reported that many of these towers have already shown power outputs in the 900 to 1000 watt range.

You Can’t Escape The Radiation. It’s Everywhere.

We simply can’t escape the exposure to this radiation. It’s everywhere. There are so many people using cell phones and wireless connections today that you don’t even have to own a cell phone to be exposed. You’re just as exposed as everyone else. Every time someone makes a call from a mobile phone the signal is sent to a cell phone tower. There are so many calls being made by everyone all around us and now there are so many mobile phone towers in operation, that all of us are caught in the crossfire. It’s like second-hand smoke from cigarettes, except that we can’t get away from it. There simply isn’t anywhere to escape.

How Mobile Phone Towers Work

Cell phone towers emit signals in a “flower petal” pattern around the tower. This 360-degree radius around the tower is called a “cell” and this is what the term “cell” in cell phone means. When your phone is in a “cell” you get good reception and when it isn’t in a?”cell” you get poor reception. So, for a cell phone company to provide complete coverage cell phone towers and antenna towers must be positioned all across the country so that the “cells” overlap. You can begin to see what a huge infrastructure needs to be created to provide complete cell phone coverage. That’s why cell phone towers and antenna towers are so prevalent. Furthermore, that’s why these antennas are installed in so many places like rooftops, fire stations, schools and churches. This is what is necessary for complete coverage.

Studies Show Adverse Health Effects From Cell Phone Towers

If you aren’t sure that cell phone towers and masts are harmful the following study summaries should convince you. Below are listed six studies that have shown significant adverse health effects on people living near cell phone towers. According to Dr. Grahame Blackwell “these are the only studies known that specifically consider the effects of masts on people. All six studies show clear and significant ill-health effects. There are no known studies relating to health effects of masts that do not show such ill-health effects.”

Santini et al. found significant health problems in people living within 300 meters of a cell phone base station or tower. The recommendation was made from the study that cell phone base stations should not be placed closer than 300 meters to populated areas. Pathol Biol (Paris) 2002; 50: 369-373.
A Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research study entitled, “Effects of Global Communications System The radio-Frequency Fields On Well Being and Cognitive Function of Human Subjects With and Without Subjective Complaints” found significant effects on well being including headaches, muscle fatigue, pain, and dizziness from tower emissions well below the “safety” level.
Gerd, Enrique, Manuel, Ceferino and Claludio conducted a Spanish study called “The Microwave Syndrome” and found adverse health effects from those living near two cell phone base stations. The health effects included fatigue, a tendency toward depression, sleeping disorders, difficulty in concentration and cardiovascular problems.
From an Israeli study published in the International Journal of Cancer Prevention, Vol. 1, No. 2, April 2004, Wolf and Wolf reported a fourfold increase in the incidence of cancer in people living within 350 meters of a cell phone tower as compared to the Israeli general population. They also reported a tenfold increase specifically among women.
In the Naila Study from Germany, November 2004, five medical doctors collaborated to assess the risk to people living near a cell phone tower. The retrospective study was taken from patient case histories between 1994 and 2004 from those who had lived during the past ten years at a distance up to 400 meters from the tower site. The results showed that the proportion of newly developed cancer cases was significantly higher in those patients living within the 400-meter distance and that the patients became ill on average eight years earlier. In the years 1999 to 2004, after five years of operation of the transmitting tower, the relative risk of getting cancer had trebled for residents of the area in the proximity of the installation compared to the inhabitants of Naila outside the area.
An Austrian Study released in May 2005, showed that radiation from a cell phone tower at a distance of 80 meters causes significant changes of the electrical currents in the brains of test subjects. All test subjects indicated they felt unwell during the radiation and some reported being seriously ill. According to the scientists doing the study, this is the first worldwide proof of significant changes of the electrical currents in the brain, as measured by EEG, by a cell phone base station at a distance of 80 meters. Subjects reported symptoms such as buzzing in the head, tinnitus, palpitations of the heart, lightheadedness, anxiety, shortness of breath, nervousness, agitation, headache, heat sensation and depression. According to scientists this is the first proof that electrical circuits in the brain are significantly affected by a cell phone tower. The distance in this study was a mere 80 meters.
Two-time Nobel Prize nominee Dr. Gerald Hyland, a physicist, had this to say about mobile phone towers. “Existing safety guidelines for cell phone towers are completely inadequate. Quite justifiably, the public remains skeptical of attempts by governments and industry to reassure them that all is well, particularly given the unethical way in which they often operate symbiotically so as to promote their own vested interests.”

Dr. Bruce Hocking did a study in Syndey, Australia, of children living near TV and FM broadcast towers, which by the way, are very similar to cell phone towers. He found that these children had more than twice the rate of leukemia as children living more than seven miles away from these towers.

Results in yet another recent study conducted on inhabitants living near or under a mobile phone base station antenna yielded the following prevalence of neuropsychiatric complaints: headache (23.5%), memory changes (28.2%), dizziness (18.8%), tremors (9.4%), depressive symptoms (21.7%), and sleep disturbances(23.5%). In this study the participants were given a neurobehavioral test battery measuring such things as problem solving, visuomotor speed, attention andmemory. Symptoms of exposed inhabitants were significantly higher than control groups.

Furthermore, Europe’s top environmental watchdog group, European Environment Agency (EEA), is calling for immediate action to reduce exposure to mobile phone masts. EEA suggests action to reduce exposure immediately to vulnerable groups such as children.

The development of brain tumors in staff members working in a building in Melbourne, Australia, prompted the closing of the top floors of the building. The Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology is housed in the building. Seven staff members were diagnosed with brain tumors and five of the seven worked on the top floor. A cell phone antenna is located on the roof of the building.

The Orange phone company in England is being forced to remove its mast tower on a building in Bristol, England. The removal is a result of a five-year effort by residents and local authorities to have the mast removed. Cancer rates in the building, which has become known internationally as the “Tower of Doom,” have soared to ten times the national average for the 110 residents living there. The two masts sitting on the roof, one owned by Orange and the other by Vodafone, were installed in 1994. Vodafone has refused the remove its mast.

Cell Phone Towers Affect Animals

Animals aren’t exempt from exposure the cell phone tower radiation either. One veterinary school in Hanover, Germany, reports that dairy cows kept in close proximity to a cell phone tower for two years had a reduction in milk production in addition to other health problems including abnormal behavior patterns.

Firefighters Vote To Suspend Cell Tower Construction On Fire Stations

Concerned about the effect that masts have on the nation’s firefighters, The International Association of Fire Fighters voted in 2004 to voice its opposition to cell phone towers and antennas being place on and around fire stations. They want proof first that there isn’t a safety issue and have asked for a moratorium on further construction and placement of any more towers or antennas on or around firehouses until such a study can be conducted.

What Are These Antennas Doing To Our Kids While They’re In School?’t worth the risk. They should not be subjected to microwave radiation when science has proven there could clearly be devastating effects as outlined in the previously mentioned studies. School boards and parent organizations need to be aware of the inherent dangers from such an exposure. It’s been clearly shown that microwave radiation penetrates the head of a child much easier than that of an adult. This is due to the thinner and softer bones in the head of child. Skull bones don’t fully harden until about age 22.

How Many Cell Phone Towers Are Near You?

The average person lives within one-half mile of a cell phone tower. Have you ever wondered how close you live or work to one of these towers? Would it bother you if one were right in your backyard? How many of these towers and antennas do you think there are in your immediate area? Find out by visiting the website http://www.antennasearch.com/. Simply type in your address and you’ll get a listing and a map of all the towers and antennas within a short radius of your address. Like most people you’ll probably gasp when you see the numbers. These towers are literally everywhere. Hundreds and hundreds of them are probably located within a few miles of your home or office.

Watch The Signal Bars On Your Cell Phone

The signal bars on your cell phone tell you how strong the signal is that are connecting to your cell phone. In other words, the closer you are to a cell phone tower the stronger the signal. The stronger the signal the less power your phone has to use to maintain the connection. A strong signal is indicated by a full set of “bars” showing on your cell phone display. Fewer bars mean a weaker signal. A weaker signal means the cell phone has to work harder to maintain the signal. Consequently, more power is needed to maintain the connection. The more power needed the greater the amount of radiation produced by your phone and the greater exposure to you. So always try to talk in outdoors or in an open space. This allows an easier connection from your cell phone to the nearest cell phone tower. Your phone won’t have to work as hard and less power is used to maintain the signal, which translates, to less radiation exposure for you.

What Can We Do?

Obviously, can’t escape the exposure. We’ve established that fact. So what can we do to minimize the damage?

Here are few ideas: We need to limit our exposure any way possible. Don’t live near a cell phone tower if you have a choice. Don’t buy a home near one even if the price is right. Limit your use of wireless devices. Go back to ‘wired’ connections whenever possible. Maximize your health through proper nutrition and good hydration. Eat foods high in antioxidants and take supplements. Eat organically as much as possible. There is no safe distance to locate away from a mast tower. Obviously, the closer to the tower the greater the exposure risk so do locate as far away as possible. Whenever possible encourage your local government officials to consider transitioning to the use of fiber optic cable. Most of it has already been laid underground. It’s just not being used. There are no masts with fiber optics and the small amount of radiation at the exits can be neutralized with technology now available. Discourage the use of Wi-Fi in schools by meeting with your school officials and school boards. Wi-Fi hotspots are popping up everywhere now. Even whole cities are going wireless with the installation of Wi-Fi. Again, it’s all done through a wireless signal, which is damaging to your health. Don’t let cell phone companies install cell phone antennas on the roofs of schools where your children attend. The radio waves are disruptive to their ability to focus, not to mention the health hazards we’ve already outlined. If you can’t change your current situation there is some hope. There are some intervention devices now available that you can use in your home, school and office to help lessen the risk of exposure. Some very good cutting-edge technology has been developed that will intervene and help mitigate the damage being done by wireless connections.